In progress
Information (no response required)
Gelfand ./. 
May 20, 2019
 
 
In the meantime, I managed to discuss the contents of the acts with my client, thanks to which he does not understand, and also wonders that not a single expert was consulted at the scene.
      
This raises the question, why not?
      
That is, what was relatively clear for the accident, with at least one seriously injured pedestrian who even died in retrospect, a record of the expert opinion for the reconstruction of the accident later would be needed here anyway.
      
       I directly ask you to resume the investigation in respect of the main culprit of the accident in the killing by negligence.
      
       Cause:

According to the signatory as well as the deceased, the previous investigation could not deny allegations of negligence.
Completely indisputable, the driver is deadly wounded a man when turning left. That the pedestrian was crossing the street on red traffic light, not proven according to local opinion.
My client is deeply saddened and shocked.
      
He did a great job and analyzed the contents of the police protocols from his point of view, recreated the emergency and analyzed it with a specialist.
      
       Confirmation: letter dated 04/10/2019, letter dated 05/15/2019 and analysis of the accident of his familiar expert.
      
Undersigned, I thought about how to deal with input data, can I subject them to editorial changes, etc., but I decided to forward this without filtering as they deal with the content of the events and the file, and from their point of view, are expressed very clearly.
      
The undersigned understands that this is "a lot of material", but it due to the fact that here a person died, and therefore all questions need respond.

In any case, you must present an indictment here, because even in the most favorable case for the person that caused the accident, he ran into a pedestrian while driving, which he simply did not notice.
      
My client categorically denies any unlawful behavior of his mother, but even if the procedure shows that the pedestrian traffic light turns red in the first second, when the victim enters the pedestrian zone, this cannot and should not lead to that (even in the case of the alleged light green arrow for the driver) that person is here just overlooked and lost.

If necessary, charges are requested to allow my client to act as a plaintiff.

According to 395, in the event of injury, the injured party may join the proceedings against the offender. In the event of a murder, each of the parents, children, brothers and deceased sisters and spouse are entitled to an additional claim (LG Kleve AnwBl 1969, 31).

Here's how it is here.
      
Therefore, it is proposed to continue the investigation and allow the applicant in the event of an indictment.
      
       If you have any questions, please contact the undersigned at any time.
      
Best regards,
lawyer

---

---

---